🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to recent research, the average family pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because political disagreements regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I can name multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.